
by Sylvia Plath
Musings on food, nature and culture by a bona fide foodie
Did you know that all of these edibles grow wild in Central Park, and that some people make a practice out of routinely foraging there for them and eating them?:
purslane
dandelion
wood sorrel
lamb’s-quarter
Asiatic dayflower
poor man’s pepper
sassafras
field garlic... ?
In response to a comment to a previous post, this is a post
about fasting. I don't claim to be any kind of expert; this is just me trying to apply common sense and the sum of whatever I've gleaned about nutrition to sift through the contradictory information that's out there on this subject.
For transparency's sake, I'll start by saying:
- I am generally biased against anything I perceive to be a fad diet popularized mainly as a means of losing weight. Nothing will ever come down the pike that beats eating appropriate portions of healthy foods and exercising, in my view.
- I am generally biased towards cultural practices that have withstood the test of thousands of years, and culturally biased towards periodic fasting from growing up Hindu. Periodic fasting is definitely encouraged by Hindu spiritual teachers. Once I turned 18 or 20, Swamiji used to say, why don't you begin fasting once a month? I have never maintained that monthly practice, but many people in my community do. I will, however, fast on particular holidays, which amounts to a few times a year.
- My definition of fasting: attempting not to consume anything caloric between sunrise and sunset – you're allowed water and tea (just brewed tea – no milk, no lemon), and if you're feeling extremely headachey around 4 o'clock, hypothetically, I wouldn't tell if you had a glass of diluted juice : ).
- In discussing fasting, I am not talking about Gandhi's quasi-suicidal weeks-long fasts; we're talking a single day, not more than one a month. The month of Ramadan would be as far as I'd go in terms of condoning the practice, again favoring a somewhat tested cultural practice.
- The real reasons to fast periodically might very well mainly be cultural and religious, and that's perfectly ok too. We're human beings; we're bodies and spirit. There might occasionally be things we do for the sake of the spirit. (As long as we're healthy and not self-destructive.)
So, what's the sum of what we "know," whether from science or from cultural tradition?
- People in many cultures have practiced periodic fasting for thousands of years.
- From an evolutionary perspective, our food supply was not always so reliable, so we have probably evolved some coping mechanisms to deal with brief periods of scarcity.
- Fasting can discipline the will to say no to food; over time, practicing periodic fasting might make choosing the right foods and rejecting the wrong ones easier. However, especially at first, people who try fasting find themselves gorging the next day. This is why fasting is an ineffective and even dangerous weight loss tool.
o When healthy cells are starved, the body enters into ketosis, or using up stores of glucose and burning fat, to keep your organs and brain functioning. Cells shift into a protective survival mode and activate cellular repair mechanisms. Understanding this mechanism has caused some experimental individuals to adopt a very aggressive calorie restricted diet in pursuit of longevity.
o One of the mechanisms for acquiring type 2 diabetes is increasing insulin resistance. Giving the body a break from constant glucose exposure might re-sensitize insulin-producing cells.
Here's the great big "but":
- The scientific evidence that periodic fasting is affirmatively healthful is mostly derived from studies on mice and rats. We don't really know if it works for us. Our brains are much bigger and much bigger consumers of glucose than most other animals, and each of our brain cells is sheathed in insulating fat.
Finally: You should definitely not attempt fasting:
- if you've got liver or kidney problems (hepatic or renal insufficiency)
- if you're immunocompromised
- if you're on medication – even Tylenol
- if you're pregnant
- if you have a wasting disease or malnutrition
- if you have a history of cardiac arrhythmia
- if you're obese
- if you have type 2 diabetes
- etc.
So, to apply some of the above to what my commentator specifically asked about, the "Master Cleanse"...
The Master Cleanse is a "detox juice diet" that is supposed to "cleanse" harmful toxins from the body and cause the body to shed excess weight. It also supposedly ends cravings for habit-forming beverages like coffee and tea. While on the diet, you drink fresh lemonade with cayenne sweetened with a very unprocessed, pure maple syrup and eat no solid food, for 10-30 days. Constipation is an issue while on this liquid diet, so people also take laxative teas.
To me – other than the claim about reducing dependence on caffeine, which makes sense simply because not consuming caffeinated beverages will have this effect – the Master Cleanse sounds like an extremely specious practice. A fad diet.
Ten to 30 days is a very long time to go without proper nutrition. In fact, it seems to me that this "Master Cleanse" allows people essentially to fast for a very extended period, by providing a few calories, vitamins, and minerals via the lemonade. So you limp along in what's basically a fast by imbibing a little glucose and vitamin C.
Most physicians and scientists will tell you that the body does an excellent job of "detoxifying" itself: that's what our skin, lungs, kidneys, liver, spleen, and digestive system are for. Phytonutrients (from eating vegetables and fruits) can actually help us to "detoxify." Some toxins are stored in our fat cells, so activating the burning of those fats through short-term starvation might be one aspect of the "cleanse" that makes sense, but that is a very extreme way to do it, and there are healthier ways to activate fat burning (exercise, for instance, and more moderate calorie restriction).
A side effect of the Master Cleanse would be the decreasing of the populations of healthy gastrointestinal bacteria we live in symbiosis with. At the end of the "cleanse," when reintroducing food, you'd have to add probiotics to help repopulate your gut with healthy bacteria.
In fact, the best way to rid the body of pesticides, hormones, prescription drugs, chemical fertilizers, heavy metals, and other toxins is probably just to stop consuming them; follow a natural, healthy diet of mostly vegetable origin; and allow the body to do its job.
Then again, there are individuals who swear by the Master Cleanse, who claim it gave them permanent weight loss, increased energy, clear skin, better vision, decreased joint pain and so on. It's quite possible many of these people were eating quite a bit of junk before going on the "cleanse," so it might have been the absence of bad foods rather than the "cleanse" itself that helped. And there's always the placebo effect.
P.S. I don't even enjoy writing about dieting/the Master Cleanse... and definitely wouldn't put it into the genre of this blog. But I do enjoy receiving and responding to posted comments : )
Meta commentary aside... Over the weekend, I was reminded for some reason about all the food and drink that's featured in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, and the lovely song about soup that the Mock Turtle sings, who in the 1999 made-for-television live action film is played by Gene Wilder, who lovingly sings, "Byooooootiful soup, byooootiful soup." If there is a better paean to soup, I am not aware of it.
Alice falls down the rabbit hole, finds the bottle labeled DRINK ME, drinks it, and shrinks; she eats the EAT ME cake, and grows. She finds a Caterpillar smoking a hookah sitting on a mushroom, one side of which will make her bigger if she eats from it, the other side of which will make her smaller. At the house with The Duchess, The Cook, The Baby, and The Duchess's Cheshire-Cat, a soup with too much pepper causes everyone to sneeze. Where does Alice go next? A Mad Tea Party! Then we have my favorite, the Mock Turtle and the Gryphon singing about some lovely soup in a tureen. The trial Alice attends is over the question of whether the Knave of Hearts stole the tarts. In one scene, there is even a Bread-and-Butterfly! And never forget the Walrus and the Carpenter, cunningly luring the oysters away and greedily slurping them down.
What does it all mean? Some say, Lewis Carroll's (Charles Lutwidge Dodgson's) preoccupation with food was a reflection of Victorian society, in which many people were starving and malnourished and during which time (much like today) food prices were skyrocketing. Some textual evidence for this interpretation can be found in the scene with the Gnat, when Alice sees the Bread-and-Butterfly. She asks what it lives on, and the Gnat answers, weak tea with cream; Alice remarks that it must be often that the Bread-and-Butterfly can't find any such tea, and must often starve and die: even in the fantasy world of Wonderland, there is hunger, starvation, and death.
I am not sure there is much to be found in Alice-in-Wonderland by way of morals. There are many "dead ends" in the book, and chaos and meaninglessness more than anything seem to be the themes. The logic grown-ups are always teaching children to mind is turned upside down and flipped backwards. Many of the words themselves are nonsense - brillig as they might be. In answering the riddle of how a raven is like a writing desk with the response (paraphrased), "I haven't the slightest idea," I wonder if Carroll is telling us, This is truly meaningless nonsense. Then again Carroll once admitted he was open to any interpretations of his books, as even if he hadn't consciously intended any grand themes or morals, they might subconsciously have made their way in.
Perhaps the lesson is, don't swallow everything you come across; think for yourself.
Most vegetables will do: spinach, green peas, green beans, carrots, etc. You can even mix in cooked lentils. The main idea is to create a pan-fried or baked patty with some ginger-and-chilli-spiced cooked vegetables, using mashed potato and egg to bind. My mother makes fish tikkis, using boiled and seasoned fish in place of the vegetables; fish tikkis require a bit less potato, since fish itself has some binding ability. Another method is to stuff the mashed potato base of the tikki, like with cheese or ground meat. Basically, you can make all kinds of tikkis.
Hariyali Tikkis (makes enough tikkis for about 4 people as an appetizer)
1 Cup mixed vegetables, finely chopped/diced (e.g., 1/4 Cup peas, 1/4 Cup green beans, 1/4 Cup carrots, 1/4 Cup spinach)
1/2 a small red onion, finely chopped
1 tsp. minced ginger
1 green chilli, minced
1/2 tsp. red chilli powder
1/2 tsp. amchur (dried mango powder)
1 tbsp. dhania (ground coriander seed)
2 tbsp. minced fresh cilantro
2 medium mashed potatoes
1-2 eggs
olive oil
salt and black pepper to taste
optional: corn meal or bread crumbs
Heat 1 tsp. olive oil in a pan on medium-high heat. Add the chopped onion, ginger, and green chilli and stir-fry until the onion is translucent. Add the red chilli powder, amchur, and dhania and stir fry until fragrant. Add the mixed vegetables and stir-fry until just cooked, adding salt and pepper to taste. Turn off the heat and mix in the fresh cilantro. Transfer the vegetable mixture to a mixing bowl and add mashed potatoes, eggs, and additional salt and pepper. Using hands, knead everything together until well mixed. For each tikki, form a ball and press it into a patty about the diameter of a cracker. If you like crispier tikkis, dredge each in corn meal or bread crumbs. Heat 1/2 tsp. olive oil in a frying pan on medium-high heat, and pan-fry each tikki for a few minutes on each side until golden brown.